Employee assistance programs (EAPs) address a wide array of concerns affecting mental and emotional well-being, such as depression, stress, anxiety, grief, family problems, relationship issues, and alcohol or other substance abuse.
To employers, the value proposition of an EAP is based on the understanding that employees with the aforementioned concerns often have troubles in their professional and personal lives that ultimately impact a company's bottom line. Historically, EAP providers have used a variety of metrics to illustrate their ability to resolve or mitigate these concerns, such as employee utilization rates, referrals to external resources, satisfaction surveys or website visits. While these measurements are effective tools to evaluate the reach of the program, they don't truly measure the impact of the EAP on employee health, well-being and productivity.
In an effort to quantify the true impact of an EAP, CuraLinc developed a proprietary assessment and follow-up process that measures baselines and outcomes from program participants. The summary below is an excerpt from CuraLinc's annual case study, 'Outcomes and Impact'.
Outcomes & Impact
Click the button below to review a web-based version of CuraLinc's Outcomes & Impact case study.
Over 70% of employees reported improved productivity after using the EAP.
69% of participants with low or moderate productivity migrated to high productivity after using the EAP.
Almost 80% of EAP participants with depression reported a measurable improvement after using the program.
Over three out of every four employees with moderate to severe depression migrated to minimal or mild depression after EAP treatment.
The average time missed from work due to the employee's presenting concern dropped from 12.4 hours to 3.7 hours after using the EAP.
From among employees who missed at least 40 hours of work prior to using the EAP, only a quarter of them missed any time at all after using the program.
Alcohol Use and abuse
The percentage of employees at higher alcohol risk levels dropped from 30% to 3% after EAP treatment.
After using the EAP, 89% of employees who used or abused alcohol were considered low risk.
Employers in the technology and manufacturing/distribution industries reported the highest EAP-driven improvement in absenteeism rates and productivity.
The EAP impacted productivity and absenteeism for Baby Boomers (born 1950-1964) at a higher rate than any other generation.
Employees who used the EAP under a formal management referral were more likely to report productivity and absenteeism improvement.
The EAP had a much greater impact on absenteeism for male employees (12.7 hours reduced), compared to female employees (5.3 hours).
Employees who presented with job stress or substance abuse reported the highest productivity and absenteeism gains after using the program.